Tag: writing

GIVE THEM AN INCH AND THEY WILL TAKE A MILE: A rant about generative AI and media consumption

(TL: DR) You have a moral imperative to not give money to companies that use generative AI, no matter how much you want to consume that media.

Recently in the news there has been plenty of stories about media companies, within the film industry in particular, that have been using AI generated images to cut corners in their work. While this has outraged many people who value the beautiful and hard work of human creatives, the more passive consumers of media tend to take a stance of “what’s the big deal, it was just five seconds/an ad/etc?”

So, what is the big deal?

GENERATIVE AI IS THEFT

Whether it is AI generated art or stories, or even voice-over, all AI generators must learn from something. Unfortunately, that something is more often than not stolen content from actual creatives who have not given permission for their work to picked apart and reassembled by a digital code.

These people put effort into their art—be that images, writing, or voice acting—and that hard work is taken by AI generators with no compensation. These AI generated shams can then be used by cheapskate companies to replace real humans with poor quality rip-offs.

LATE NIGHT WITH THE DEVIL

I was incredibly excited for this movie—a 70s-style television show horror with David Dastmalchian leading? Sign me the fuck up, inject that shit into my veins!

My excitement was squashed when the news came that the studio had used AI generated images for some stills and the background of the set. Suddenly, a movie I was dying to see in theatres became one I refused to see on principle.

When it came out that the directors said that AI had been used but then edited, it was even more confusing—if they had just paid artists initially, they could have avoided ending up with the poorly edited nonsense they put in the movie.

Many people may think my refusal to see it in theatres is an overreaction— “it’s only three stills and the background, the rest of the movie is made by humans!”

My question is why couldn’t all of it been made by humans?

Afterall, it was only three stills and the background.

A24 AND CIVIL WAR

For those who do not know A24, they are an entertainment company. They have produced some films I absolutely adore: Ari Aster’s ‘Hereditary,’ Robert Egger’s ‘The Lighthouse,’ Halina Reijn’s ‘Bodies, Bodies, Bodies,’ and many more.

They are known for films that are original and weird, and often arty.

So, their recent use of AI images to advertise the film Civil War feels like a slap in the face to the fans. It is a complete disregard of the trust and goodwill they have built up in audiences over the years by pretending to champion a wide variety of filmmaker’s strange and unique stories. They have thrown it all away by removing that all-important human element, using poorly done AI to create false advertisements.

They have shown that they are happy to cut out creatives from the process.

How far will they be willing to go in the future?

YOUR MEDIA CONSUMPTION AND THE FUTURE OF AI

“It’s only a little bit here and there, it doesn’t matter!”

It is just the occasional little bit right now, but where does it end?

The truth is this: if the bigwigs in the media companies realise that they can use generative AI and people will still consume their content, then they will happily replace real creatives with it to save money.

Pigs who happily eat slop will not be fed caviar.

“AI is the future, whether you like it or not!”

Lazy and defeatist, this attitude is the only reason generative AI will ever succeed over real creatives.

If you prove to the media companies that they cannot make money with second-rate soulless imagery and writing, then they will not use it. They will do anything to protect the money. That is your leverage as the consumer.

All that needs to happen is your need to fight for quality must outweigh your desire to consume.

“If everything starts using it, what will we watch!”

There is multiple decades of film and television from countries all around the world from a time before generative AI concerns. There are loads of books and comics etc. too, for those worried about other forms of media.

You have plenty to catch up on without worrying about the latest AI generated sell-out.

“But I really want to watch this specific thing right now!”

Find a way to do it without giving the company money. We have the internet—it is not difficult.

Starve them of the money and they will lose incentive to replace real creatives with AI.

“I bet you’ll watch something with AI in!”

Yeah, I can imagine that at some point I will see a movie in the cinema and then it will be in the news that it used AI.

And I will be like “fuck sake” and try better next time.

Just try better next time.

REFLECTING: Volunteer Editorial Assistant Job

My volunteer editorial assistant job at Divinations Magazine has come to an end! Here’s how it went…

For the first stage, I was assigned a couple of pieces to read and assess their suitability for the upcoming issue. The magazine kindly provided a document detailing what sort of things to look out for while reading which helped the process along. Having read the previous issues also made things easier, as I knew what sort of tone and style the magazine was already looking for.

I enjoyed picking apart the pieces and writing the feedback for them, but it was tough to reject something. As an author, turning another person’s piece away felt like I was shooting myself in the gut, but it was unavoidable. The piece in question had a great concept and some beautiful description but lacked focus–hopefully the author will refine it and find a home for it in the future.

The magazine agreed with my feedback and conclusions, and we were able to move onto the next stage: editing.

I was given a very short story–100 words–to edit for the magazine. Again, a handy document on what to look for was provided by the magazine. Nonetheless, this was a tricky job because the author (unsurprisingly) hadn’t made a whole lot of obvious errors in such a short piece. However, when I sat down and really combed through it, I was able to make some style and clarity suggestions that I think made the piece flow better overall.

Luckily, the magazine once again agreed with my ideas and the edits were sent back to the author for approval. (They even agreed with my suggestion of using a semi-colon, a piece of punctuation I am only 85% sure that I know how to use correctly…)

Now, we wait for publication! I’m really looking forward to seeing the final product and getting to read all the other pieces that got accepted. This was such a fun and informative experience and Divinations were great to work for–polite, prompt, and encouraging.

I loved the whole thing, and I am so happy I got to do this.